Talk:Rec 2

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Spanish cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plot translation

It's fucking wrong...wrong. Horrible translation. Someone please fix it.

Why don't you fix it if you know what it should be? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.35.133.12 (talk) 13:13, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"something religious"? that's a pretty vague description. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.142.72.252 (talk) 05:44, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh.. "[he] does something religious and..."

—C Teng ^(talk) 03:14, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - I just watched the film and the plot description as it stands, while by and large correct, is very poorly written. It feels less like a bad translation and more like it was written by a teen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.11.113.62 (talk) 06:13, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also Known As

Recently, this movie title has become expanded to match the sequels: REC 2: Fear Revisited. (Keithbaker (talk) 16:52, 13 September 2013 (UTC))[reply]

More like "often referred to" than "also known as" at this point (24.19.230.53 (talk) 17:00, 13 September 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Yes, good notion. Sort of like what happened to Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope as the franchise extends itself. (Keithbaker (talk) 17:06, 13 September 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Here is an example specimen: http://www.shockya.com/news/2011/08/08/dvd-review-rec-2-fear-revisited/ (Keithbaker (talk) 17:18, 13 September 2013 (UTC))[reply]

I've noticed that this is now the IMDb display title for REC 2, if that has any weight. (24.19.230.53 (talk) 17:26, 13 September 2013 (UTC))[reply]

It turned out to be just a flushing of the stylized title out of IMDb system since people couldn't find the film's page within the database, not a retitling of the film. 24.19.230.53 (talk) 14:05, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification Keithbaker (talk) 20:41, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Overzealous fan title added on IMDb, yet the actors' names are now being add to the REC 2 photo gallery on IMDb. So there's some good come from it if it's all related. 206.188.38.230 (talk) 20:49, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy it's still "[Rec] 2", Thank you. 206.188.38.230 (talk) 20:51, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:REC (film) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:04, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]